1 |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:08:38PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:08:52AM -0800, Greg KH wrote |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> > Again, any specific pointer to a commit in the tree that caused this? |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> See http://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Udev/upgrade&redirect=no |
9 |
>>> Comments? |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> As I don't know who made those wiki changes, I don't know, but this |
12 |
>> seems to be a choice made by the gentoo udev maintainers, not |
13 |
>> necessarily the upstream developer's choice. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Udev/upgrade&action=history |
16 |
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Astaecker |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Best ask him, I suppose. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -- |
21 |
> :wq |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
This drives the whole discussion off-topic so lets just stop here. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |