Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:25:37
Message-Id: CAG2jQ8iA=BsWePOJv_5maJZmu7fOwxz7kckhGhbD8LftWVK9cA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) by Michael Mol
1 On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:08:38PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
4 >>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:08:52AM -0800, Greg KH wrote
5 >>>
6 >>> > Again, any specific pointer to a commit in the tree that caused this?
7 >>>
8 >>> See http://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Udev/upgrade&redirect=no
9 >>> Comments?
10 >>
11 >> As I don't know who made those wiki changes, I don't know, but this
12 >> seems to be a choice made by the gentoo udev maintainers, not
13 >> necessarily the upstream developer's choice.
14 >
15 > http://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Udev/upgrade&action=history
16 > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Astaecker
17 >
18 > Best ask him, I suppose.
19 >
20 > --
21 > :wq
22 >
23
24 This drives the whole discussion off-topic so lets just stop here.
25
26 --
27 Regards,
28 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2