Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Output / End User Experience | ||
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:30:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4FFB7728.8040003@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Portage Output / End User Experience by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On 07/09/2012 07:02 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | > Is there any way for portage to figure out that one of those is the |
| 3 | > eventual outcome, and then direct the user to the minimal changes to |
| 4 | > accomplish either? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | You could try a larger emerge --backtrack setting. If it doesn't settle |
| 7 | on a sensible solution, then it would be interesting to look at --debug |
| 8 | output, to find out what has gone wrong. |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Thanks, |
| 11 | Zac |