| 1 |
On 10/8/19 7:21 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> In any case, since many people *do* rely on it, maybe we should declare it |
| 3 |
> official? [+] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> And, if that's OK with both of you, move it onto infra hardware? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Happy to sponsor both for the next council meeting agenda. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> [+] At some point the one remaining whiner doesnt count anymore. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
In the past, infra has been understandably hesitant to take on new |
| 14 |
services due to staffing issues. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Additionally, I understand that the current infra design does not easily |
| 17 |
allow granular access control, preventing non-infra members from easily |
| 18 |
performing maintenance on individual services. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Has this situation changed? I doubt infra want to take responsibility |
| 21 |
for the bot, and I don't fancy the hassle of trying to find people to |
| 22 |
poke things on my behalf. |
Archives