Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: aballier@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Support MULTILIB_USEDEP for writing USE-deps.
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:55:52
Message-Id: 20130115185615.1faeff34@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Support MULTILIB_USEDEP for writing USE-deps. by Alexis Ballier
1 On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:42:27 -0300
2 Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:25:16 +0100
5 > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:19:36 -0300
8 > > Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote:
9 > >
10 > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:31:46 +0100
11 > > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
12 > > >
13 > > > > Although the eclass does 'multilib?' only now, in the future it is
14 > > > > likely to use more fine-tuned ABI flags.
15 > > > > ---
16 > > > > gx86/eclass/autotools-multilib.eclass | 12 ++++++++++++
17 > > >
18 > > > I think it'd better fit in a more generic eclass like
19 > > > multilib.eclass
20 > >
21 > > Yes, I was thinking about that. Probably would be easy to move
22 > > the relevant functions into it.
23 > >
24 > > The name remains the question -- multilib-utils? :D
25 >
26 > I'd say multilib.eclass; it probably doesn't deserve a new eclass, and
27 > multilib.eclass is already what could be called multilib-utils.eclass :)
28
29 But that variable requires IUSE... and adding IUSE to multilib.eclass
30 seems like a bad idea to me.
31
32 I was saying 'multilib-utils' as with the common mistake started with
33 'cmake-utils', and then forked as 'autotools-utils' (because
34 'autotools' was taken, I guess).
35
36 --
37 Best regards,
38 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Support MULTILIB_USEDEP for writing USE-deps. Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>