| 1 |
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:49:43PM +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 2 |
> Piotr Jaroszy??ski wrote: |
| 3 |
> >What do you think? |
| 4 |
> I think it would be much nicer to have a VCS with support for atomic |
| 5 |
> commits. |
| 6 |
I agre, from multiple points of view including those of 1. developer |
| 7 |
who has broken stuff with epkgmove, 2. developer who has broken things |
| 8 |
moving by hand 3. CVS administrator, 4. general infra. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
However, for several reasons this is not yet feasible, and furthermore |
| 11 |
purely atomic commits will not negate the need for the block_sync |
| 12 |
functionality. Tree breakage has been noticed in the past, and infra has |
| 13 |
been asked to block the rsync process until the breakage was fixed. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 18 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 19 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives