1 |
On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 04:14, Wouter van Kleunen wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2 May 2003, George Shapovalov wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I totaly agree with the choice argument. |
5 |
> > Then, personally I have a mixed feeling about this system. On one hand I have |
6 |
> > all the same arguments about introducing unnecessary dependencies, tightness |
7 |
> > and non-compliance (not that our present way is completely "compliant", but |
8 |
> > this one is much further away.). |
9 |
> > On the other hand this is quite a nice approach to automation of init scripts |
10 |
> > handling and looks to be a clean way to parallelize the process. The former |
11 |
> > should allow creation of nicely looking front ends for init sequence |
12 |
> > manipulation, which even a newbie user should be able to apply for simplistic |
13 |
> > manipulation, but that should also allow a more involved edits for the |
14 |
> > inclined user. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > This makes me think, that both approaches have a room to existance as they are |
17 |
> > targeting diferent situations (namely small goal-specific systems, where |
18 |
> > tightness and hands-on controll are a must vs desktop and ease-of-abuse). |
19 |
> > Thus the only sensible way of going about adding this to gentoo I see is to |
20 |
> > create a new (experimental) profile. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Wouter: this apparently requires: |
23 |
> > 1. impementation to stabilize |
24 |
> Yup. I believe it is usable now, but only for people who know what they |
25 |
> are doing. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> > 2. finding large enough group of interested people, who would provide support |
28 |
> > and maintaince to the profile (and this is apparently pointless without some |
29 |
> > backing on a user side) |
30 |
> I cannot write all the services myself, so indeed i need people to back me |
31 |
> up on this. The same goes for sysvinit, the author of sysvinit did not |
32 |
> write all the init scripts in the world. |
33 |
|
34 |
I'll definitly help out writing scripts. Your system is so much easier |
35 |
to read than sysvinit. And it's a lot easier to write for. It's more |
36 |
english like. And, hey, if you can't write for XML, I don't know WHAT |
37 |
you've been doing all these years. Everybody should know HTML, and XML's |
38 |
syntax is the exact same. There's only about five new words to learn to |
39 |
get your XML down pat. I don't understand why people are being such a |
40 |
stick in the mud about all this. |
41 |
|
42 |
> |
43 |
> > 3. appropriate packaging of all related software, so that it could be |
44 |
> > effectively handled by the profile.. |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> > As you see not too small amount of work ;), but who knows, may be some time |
47 |
> > this will become more popular than our present way? |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > George |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> > On Friday 02 May 2003 13:34, Joshua Brindle wrote: |
53 |
> > > >On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0700, Jon Kent wrote: |
54 |
> > > >It's not a proposal to change Gentoo's default init-system (or at least I |
55 |
> > > >hope so). I fully support the OP with his work because one can never know |
56 |
> > > >what it provides untill it's available. |
57 |
> > > > |
58 |
> > > >So, keep up the development. |
59 |
> > > |
60 |
> > > I agree. Everyone here should know very well that gentoo is about |
61 |
> > > choices. We provide the user with choices every opportunity we have, |
62 |
> > > though some places it's difficult to do. When a choice presents itself |
63 |
> > > don't scrutinize it, we do not ever attempt to lock users into a single |
64 |
> > > solution, and we make every attempt to provide as many choices as possible. |
65 |
> > > |
66 |
> > > On the subject of init scripts, I recall having a conversation with seemant |
67 |
> > > about this init system which used tree based dependancies and could start |
68 |
> > > init scripts simaltaeneously if their dependancy trees didn't collide (for |
69 |
> > > faster bootups), does this solution provide this? we'd really like to get |
70 |
> > > something that will take some of the overhead out of the init system... |
71 |
> > > |
72 |
> > > Joshua Brindle |
73 |
> > |
74 |
> > |
75 |
> > -- |
76 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
77 |
> > |
78 |
> |
79 |
> |
80 |
> -- |
81 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
82 |
-- |
83 |
Wesley Leggette <wleggette@××××.net> |
84 |
|
85 |
|
86 |
-- |
87 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |