| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > After having a quick look at it on Friday I thought that htdig |
| 5 |
> > doesn't fit well with the webapps mindset. The bulk of the |
| 6 |
> > package is executables for index creation/maintenance that are |
| 7 |
> > currently installed into /usr/bin et al. Only htsearch and |
| 8 |
> > support HTML/images go into the website directories. While I |
| 9 |
> > could maintain that separation under webapps, with a single set |
| 10 |
> > of binaries, it would disallow the multiple version support in |
| 11 |
> > the webapps concept. Should the binaries be put somewhere else? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Alternately symlink /usr/bin/htdig to the latest version in wherever webapp |
| 15 |
installs it. (/usr/lib/${PF} maybe if nothing is specified) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Just a thought without too much looking into it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Which ever way suits me. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- -- |
| 22 |
Daniel Black <dragonheart@g.o> |
| 23 |
Gentoo Embedded Project |
| 24 |
irc://irc.freenode.org:6667/gentoo-embedded |
| 25 |
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-embedded |
| 26 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/ |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFA1ol2hhpKunZncJcRAvQcAJ9XqAk8Ciy3nU978aT7qaSCN6/WCQCeIfBk |
| 31 |
qvBF93yZtXJgTDourDJyLak= |
| 32 |
=cAf9 |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives