Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Torsten Rehn <scel@××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:06:53
Message-Id: 200802161106.43553.scel@xdap.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings by Oleg Puchinin
1 On Saturday 16 February 2008, Oleg Puchinin wrote:
2 > " is not compiled At all "
3 > "works"
4
5 All stable ebuilds in the tree should work, if they don't that's an exception
6 and will probably get fixed soon after the failure is discovered anyway.
7 Anyone who is willing to test a new keyword in an ebuild shouldn't have a
8 problem filing a KEYWORDREQ in Bugzilla.
9
10 > "It is excellent"
11
12 If you want package ratings, take a look at ohloh.net or something, shouldn't
13 be hard (for a human) to map the package names there to the ones in Gentoo.
14
15 > "I wish to see a package in Gentoo "
16
17 Again, all the most important software is already in the tree, if you need
18 something else, filing a bug is not too much effort.
19
20 --
21 Torsten Rehn <scel@××××.org>
22 Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
23 http://scel.info

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature