Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Resignation
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:42:04
Message-Id: 20070419093956.6371df78@snowflake
1 On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:29:29 +0200
2 "Ioannis Aslanidis" <aslanidis@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > > The real point is that bug-wranglers has lost over 50% of it's
4 > > effectiveness, again imo. jakub and spanky are the two main guys,
5 > > and it's not just the loss of jakub's prodigious work-rate, which
6 > > kept a lot bugs from even reaching devs, but the loss of his
7 > > influence on QA which is a complete disaster for gentoo.
8 >
9 > Add +1 to that.
10
11 Alright, since the hyperbole won't stop...
12
13 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167285#c11
14 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160328
15 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96893#c12
16 http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_142226.xml
17 http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=116232604808191&w=2
18
19 ...does anyone want another few pages of that kind of thing? Devrel has
20 for once gotten something more or less right. Perhaps people should be
21 thanking them instead.
22
23 --
24 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Resignation Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Resignation "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@g.o>
[proctors] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Resignation Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>