| 1 |
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:35:59 +0100 |
| 2 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Le dimanche 13 janvier 2013 à 19:09 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : |
| 4 |
> > On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:03:20 +0100 |
| 5 |
> > Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > - if has ${EAPI-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && has doc ${IUSE} ; |
| 7 |
> > > then |
| 8 |
> > > + if has ${EAPI:-0} 0 1 2 3 4 && in_iuse doc ; then |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > This is still wrong... You can't use IUSE like that. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I think this debate has already happened on this very list. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yes, it has, and the conclusion was that in_iuse was not to be used in |
| 16 |
the way that you're using it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives