1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> posted |
2 |
200905211957.55040.Arfrever@g.o, excerpted below, on Thu, 21 May |
3 |
2009 19:57:49 +0200: |
4 |
|
5 |
> 2009-05-20 20:00:43 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): |
6 |
>> On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:12:56 +0200 |
7 |
>> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
>> > This error occurs only when there is no up-to-date cache for given |
9 |
>> > ebuild. rsync users would see only the usual "masked by: EAPI 3" |
10 |
>> > message. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> We always have to assume that there might not be an up to date cache. |
13 |
>> The Gentoo rsync mirrors do not always ship up to date cache, |
14 |
>> particularly if someone's just changed a widely used eclass. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Users can wait an hour and run `emerge --sync` again. Anyway, Portage |
17 |
> still allows to install other ebuilds (with lower EAPI) of given |
18 |
> package, so this corner case doesn't need to slow down progress. |
19 |
|
20 |
Except that users are STRONGLY encouraged (on threat of ban) from syncing |
21 |
more than once a day. A 24-hour wait can seem like a long time, |
22 |
especially when you're doing your weekly update on your one off day a |
23 |
week, so it's effectively a 7-day wait, or you were updating your folks |
24 |
computer on holiday and it could be a multi-month wait, or when |
25 |
something's broken that you're depending on to make that presentation in |
26 |
the morning and you know the new version fixes it because the bug said so. |
27 |
|
28 |
If we're going to be saying wait an hour, then let's get rid of the wait |
29 |
24-hours thing. Otherwise, that's mixed messages to users and as Ciaran |
30 |
points out, users get confused by such things. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
34 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
35 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |