| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 01 March 2006 19:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Unless there are any huge flaws found, I'd like this to be voted on by |
| 4 |
>> the council -- looks like it'll have to wait until April's meeting to |
| 5 |
>> fit in with the two weeks rule. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> may push council meeting back to 3rd tuesday if people wish |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I'd certainly like to see GLEP 42 addressed this month, if at all |
| 10 |
possible. That said, the two-weeks rule is to avoid inconveniencing the |
| 11 |
Council and unfairly springing something upon the devs without a chance |
| 12 |
to look at the details. It's certainly a good rule, but I don't think |
| 13 |
it should be considered inviolable. If there is an emergency, or the |
| 14 |
issue is sufficiently well known that the entire two weeks notice seems |
| 15 |
unnecessary, then I would think the Council could decide to make an |
| 16 |
exception. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-g2boojum- |
Archives