Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sam James <sam@g.o>
To: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@×××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, vapier@××××××××.org, Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o>, proxy-maint@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Mailing list for ebuild patches? (Was: Re: [PATCH] media-libs/freetype: fix GCC usage during configure)
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 05:13:02
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] media-libs/freetype: fix GCC usage during configure by Adrian Ratiu
1 > On 7 Jan 2022, at 13:08, Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@×××××××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > If $CC_BUILD is not set, configure defaults to GCC for some
4 > of its tests causing clang builds to use a mixture of the
5 > two compilers instead of using just clang consistently.
6 > [snip]
8 Thanks!
10 Looks like Polynomial-C applied this as <>.
12 FWIW, normally we don't post individual package patches
13 to this ML, but it's a good question as to.. where they should go
14 if people want to use git send-email/a ML workflow.
16 Right now, sometimes people send them to gentoo-proxy-maint
17 (the list) which the proxy maintainers team that handles
18 most user contributions looks at, but I'll be honest and say
19 our workflow isn't really optimised for it given it's used
20 pretty infrequently.
22 Makes me wonder if we should rename the list
23 or have a separate one (gentoo-patches?).
25 (Or just use that list and make sure people CC
26 maintainers as you did here?)
28 Best,
29 sam


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature