| 1 |
On 23/09/13 16:08, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> can't believe it was like that for amd64-fbsd and nobody noticed before, |
| 3 |
> fixed that. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
scratch that too. left it at dev. |
| 6 |
if the entire tree is fine with some arch being at ~ and no dependencies |
| 7 |
are broken, that could counted as 'stable' too. |
| 8 |
then setting it from 'dev' to 'stable' will just make sure nobody breaks |
| 9 |
the perfect record of no dependencies broken. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
it might be useful to have another status added to the profiles.desc for |
| 12 |
that case, like 'semi-stable' or whatever since amd64-fbsd might not fit |
| 13 |
either, 'dev' or 'stable' :/ |
Archives