1 |
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Alexandre Buisse wrote: |
2 |
> The answer to that remark, and it has already been done in today's |
3 |
> discussions, is that we should follow the spirit of the law and not its |
4 |
> letter. But then, why do we need a Code of Conduct at all? There is |
5 |
> nothing in it that people don't already know and if they choose to still |
6 |
> commit the offense, it's either that they don't think it's one or that |
7 |
> they choose to ignore the consequences and commit it anyway. In both |
8 |
> cases, having a written code won't change a thing. |
9 |
|
10 |
sure it does ... if you dont outline consequences, how can there be any ? the |
11 |
spirit lives on; dont be an asshat and there's nothing for you to worry |
12 |
about ... if you start being being offensive, then you get tied down in rules |
13 |
|
14 |
> I think that everyone should be free to participate in any discussion |
15 |
> as long as some outrageous behaviours like racism are not shown and that |
16 |
> the discussion stays on topic. But forcing people to not flame (and how |
17 |
> does one define that anyway?) is simply an unnecessary freedom |
18 |
> restriction. Great ideas can come from heated discussions, which can |
19 |
> even be considered as a sign of good health, since people care enough to |
20 |
> defend their ideas with passion. Or sometimes it is just funny, even if |
21 |
> not everyone "gets it". As long as one doesn't have to participate to |
22 |
> this discussion, I don't see any problem. |
23 |
|
24 |
there's a difference between a heated discussion and flaming ... lumping the |
25 |
two together as being inseparable is wrong |
26 |
|
27 |
> So my "solution" would be to just let things go as they currently are. |
28 |
> If people want to make asses of themselves in public, great, let them do |
29 |
> just that. If you don't like someone else, just don't read what they |
30 |
> post. But if you freely choose to participate to a flame, live with the |
31 |
> consequences, including the possibility of being called names by someone |
32 |
> else (I don't know if there is an english equivalent, but a french |
33 |
> saying goes like : "it's a gourmet delice to be called an asshole by an |
34 |
> idiot") and don't complain afterwards about it, because by acknowledging |
35 |
> the very existence of the trolls, you fed them and gave them a target. |
36 |
|
37 |
we've tried this in the past and the only real thing we have to show for it |
38 |
are people leaving and offers of support withdrawn |
39 |
-mike |