1 |
On 05/11/14 18:49, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 05/11/14 02:16, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> When I was taking my ebuild quizzes, I asked for someone to clarify the |
6 |
>>> implicit system dependency that we have enshrined in the devmanual: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485356 |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> There is... some agreement, but also special cases and special-special |
11 |
>>> cases that are folklore-only at this point. To me it seems like a fine |
12 |
>>> thing to ask the council to sort out, so I'm asking here for discussion. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> Can we come up with an idiot-proof list (or FLOWCHART, even!) of what |
15 |
>>> should and should not be excluded from *DEPEND? |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Assume a C runtime and a C compiler do exist. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I would extend that to a C++ compiler and library as well. |
22 |
|
23 |
We are having yet another C++-moment (libstdc++ as usual) so it might |
24 |
change, please beware. |
25 |
|
26 |
lu |