Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alastair Tse <liquidx@g.o>
To: Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] not missing feature for package.unmask
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:08:13
Message-Id: 1055336886.20630.94.camel@huggins.eng.cam.ac.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] not missing feature for package.unmask by "Kurt V. Hindenburg"
1 On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 01:02, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
2
3 > Calculating dependencies /
4 > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "app-crypt/cryptplug" have been
5 > masked.
6
7 Maybe because you're on a x86 profile and not ~x86?
8
9 % fgrep KEYWORDS cryptplug-0.3.15.ebuild
10 KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc"
11
12 AFAIK, that package.unmask only affects things in pacakge.mask, you are
13 still restricted by ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.
14
15 Cheers,
16 --
17 Alastair 'liquidx' Tse
18 >> Gentoo Developer
19 >> http://www.liquidx.net/ | http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/
20 >> GPG Key : http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/liquidx_gentoo_org.asc
21 >> FingerPrint : 579A 9B0E 43E8 0E40 EE93 BB1C 38CE 1C7B 3907 14F6

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] not missing feature for package.unmask "Kurt V. Hindenburg" <khindenburg@××××××××××××.net>