| 1 |
I think it's much easier to update a ebuild with a USE flag to current |
| 2 |
version / with current patches (You need to update only one file) as to |
| 3 |
do this with a special and the normal version (You need to update 2 |
| 4 |
files). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Sebastian |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- |
| 9 |
Von: gentoo-dev-admin@g.o [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@g.o] Im |
| 10 |
Auftrag von Joachim Blaabjerg |
| 11 |
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2002 16:01 |
| 12 |
An: gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 13 |
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
On 10 Jan 2002 15:40:40 +0100 |
| 16 |
Mikael Hallendal <hallski@g.o> wrote: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Nice! |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I know ;) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> We don't want to add this to all ebuilds not supporting the |
| 24 |
> secure-stuff. This will be very hard and unmaintainable. Better would |
| 25 |
be |
| 26 |
> to create a profile which includes packages and version and then use |
| 27 |
> that profile for the secured version (thus not making it possible to |
| 28 |
> install any other packages). |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Ah, okay, I see... But what do you think, will there be a USE variable, |
| 31 |
or |
| 32 |
something else? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Joachim Blaabjerg |
| 36 |
styx@×××××.org |
| 37 |
www.SuxOS.org |
| 38 |
_______________________________________________ |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 41 |
http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives