1 |
Hi, any one around who still has the ebuild for the old 6.x version |
2 |
of the net-dialup/hsfmodem ebuild ? |
3 |
|
4 |
I just upgraded my system, and emerge updated to the now unmasked 7.x version of this package |
5 |
|
6 |
unfortunately the 7.x tree (as has been mentioned in several bugreports) |
7 |
is commercial and the hardware driver is crippled until "activated" with a license key |
8 |
|
9 |
while 6.x was working fine and unlimited with a less restrictive license |
10 |
|
11 |
I still have the tar.bz2 file but Im missing the ebuild to downgrade again |
12 |
|
13 |
Of course one might argue I could buy a license - but I never will: |
14 |
|
15 |
Selling drivers for money to get hardware working you already bought |
16 |
is a very dangerous business model that should in no way be supported. |
17 |
|
18 |
A commercial driver is actually worse than no driver at all, because the |
19 |
company selling the commercial product has all interest |
20 |
(and contracts with the manufacturer) to keep there monopoly established |
21 |
by keeping the specs secret and hold their "intellectual property" under |
22 |
restrictions that would make any 3rd party driver illegal and impossible |
23 |
|
24 |
Actually from there its a very close step to selling time-restricted licenses |
25 |
that need monthly fees to work or something like this |
26 |
|
27 |
Imagine - buy your hardware - then pay protection to the driver seller to be able to use it... |
28 |
Its like what printer manufacturers are doing with the ink - but thats another story |
29 |
|
30 |
As had been stated in one of the bugs - you should keep an old ebuild with the still free driver around |
31 |
|
32 |
would be a shame if I had to switch to Microsoft Windows to use my modem and go online ... |
33 |
(just kidding) |
34 |
|
35 |
So could anyone of you devs reput an old ebuild into the portage tree? |
36 |
Or at least point me to an archive where it could be found? |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
thnx |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
Corvus |