1 |
On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 22:32 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On July 28, 2020 9:57:44 PM EDT, Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > That dependency is only if USE="-gnuefi". sys-boot/gnu-efi has no |
5 |
> > Python |
6 |
> > dependency. Instead of masking/removing refind, remove the USE flag and |
7 |
> > force the gnu-efi dependency, or reverse the condition, add |
8 |
> > IUSE="tianocore", and mask that USE flag. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: |
13 |
> > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:17 PM Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> |
14 |
> > wrote: |
15 |
> > > > > sys-boot/refind |
16 |
> > > > |
17 |
> > > > How did you conclude that this package depends on Python at all? |
18 |
> > > > |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > Hi, Matt. It has a dependency on sys-boot/udk which was masked due to |
21 |
> > > using py2.7 only. Hope that helps. |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > > -- |
24 |
> > > Cheers, |
25 |
> > > Aaron |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> |
28 |
> That is for the maintainer to decide. Hence, all the previous discussions surrounding this topic. It is a massive undertaking to remove py2.7 from the tree. |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
It is a massive undertaking to figure out which of the deep dependencies |
32 |
made you conclude to list perfectly maintained Python 3-only packages. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Best regards, |
36 |
Michał Górny |