Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Mattsson <michael@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] wrong glibc patch ?
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 12:09:54
Message-Id: 000c01c23e35$3face740$0a01a8c0@neptune
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] wrong glibc patch ? by Rigo
1 > From: Rigo
2 > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 6:00 AM
3 >
4 > I just read this on the forums...Anybody any comments ?
5 >
6 > Regards, Rigo
7 > <SNIP>
8 > I
9 > installed a cvs snap of gcc-3.1.1 (about to be released - yeah
10 > right!)
11 >
12 > Build of glibc-2.2.5 will bomb unless the following patch is
13 > applied. I stole this from the stable glibc-2.2.6 branch of
14 > cvs. And for the record, this is slightly different to the
15 > patch the gentoo guys are using. Their's is wrong.
16
17
18 I use the "-march=athlon-tbird" flag and never noticed this or any other
19 problem.
20 I had gcc-3.1.1 installed and recompiled glibc-2.2.5 without any major
21 issue. I now have gcc-3.2 installed with glibc-2.2.5 and still have no
22 problem. When I upgrade gcc I normally like to recompile all libraries
23 and most applications.
24
25 By the looks of this, this issue may only show when compiling with the
26 "i686" flag.
27
28
29 Cheers,
30
31 Michael
32 michael@××××××.com