| 1 |
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:02:47 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > We had this discussion when the function was introduced. It's |
| 4 |
> > supposed to be used for cosmetic things only. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> What are "cosmetics" things? Also, what do you mean by "It's |
| 7 |
> supposed"? Who should decide what "is supposed" and what not? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The Council decides, by voting on what PMS says. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> From past discussions I remember somebody remembered me that, when you |
| 12 |
> talk here, you are simply talking as another one subscribed here, like |
| 13 |
> me and others, you don't represent PMS team and have no special rule |
| 14 |
> to forbid us what to do, that is the reason why I asked for more |
| 15 |
> opinions about how to handle this situation in the tree and why I |
| 16 |
> demanded Alexandre to wait a bit before commiting second way because |
| 17 |
> that way simply adds more complication with no benefit apart of |
| 18 |
> address your complaints even leaving the rest of the tree |
| 19 |
> (ebuilds/eclasses already using it) unchanged. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
You are welcome to read PMS yourself if you like. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives