Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:42:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130615174230.33a7592c@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell by Tom Wijsman |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:24:13 +0200 |
| 2 | Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > What does it take to change future specifications to guarantee this? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | You can have it from EAPI 6 onwards. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > What's holding this from becoming guaranteed? Why not fix the specs? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | The specs accurately reflect Portage behaviour at the time the specs |
| 10 | were approved. The point of a stable EAPI is that once approved it |
| 11 | doesn't change. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |