1 |
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 16:40 +0000, Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
2 |
> On 23/03/06, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 14:41 +0000, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
4 |
> > > Your nightmare scenario seems unavoidable. Enabling per-overlay bug |
5 |
> > > tracking doesn't stop users posting bugs in bugzilla. It just causes |
6 |
> > > confusion for users, because they're not sure where to go. Normally, |
7 |
> > > it's not a problem - because the overlay contributors are normally the |
8 |
> > > owners of the real package. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > No, it does not stop them, but it sure will curb the number of users |
11 |
> > posting their bugs to the wrong place. Remember that only more advanced |
12 |
> > users are the ones using overlays. We won't have Joe Sixpack using an |
13 |
> > overlay. Instead it'll be Bob Developer-to-be. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> If the software a user wants is in an overlay, then the user will be |
16 |
> forced to install the overlay. |
17 |
|
18 |
It shouldn't be in the overlay, is I think the point many are trying to |
19 |
make. If the software is good enough for any of our users, it should be |
20 |
good enough for the tree. |
21 |
|
22 |
Yes, I know that this isn't a realistic stance, but we can't go around |
23 |
thinking that overlays won't negatively impact the tree, either. |
24 |
|
25 |
> Another thing that some people may not have considered - with many |
26 |
> developers using various permutations of overlays, how can you |
27 |
> guarantee that what is being checked into the main tree will build for |
28 |
> a normal user? In order to test that, a developer would have to |
29 |
> disable all overlays, unemerge everything provided by the overlays, |
30 |
> and then build and test with a plain "non-overlay" gentoo. That's a |
31 |
> lot of work; I doubt most developers are doing it. |
32 |
|
33 |
Developers should be doing testing in a chroot, really. I'll definitely |
34 |
agree with you that many do not. |
35 |
|
36 |
> There is a discussion on the forums at the moment along a similar |
37 |
> topic http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-443469.html - the vote |
38 |
> seems to indicate 58% of users are "not really happy with the way the |
39 |
> portage tree is handled". |
40 |
|
41 |
No. It indicates nothing except that 58% of the 80 people who filled |
42 |
out the poll are "not really happy with the way the portage tree is |
43 |
handled" which by my counts, isn't even a drop in the bucket of our |
44 |
number of users, making the statistic completely worthless. |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Chris Gianelloni |
48 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
49 |
x86 Architecture Team |
50 |
Games - Developer |
51 |
Gentoo Linux |