Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:19:33
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default by hasufell
1 18.08.2014 16:04, hasufell пишет:
2 >> You have my strong opposition on such change as well. It will turn
3 >> ebuilds into unreadable and undpredictable mess, please do not do that
4 >>
5 >
6 > They are already fairly unreadable and unpredictable.
7 >
9 For you - maybe. But not for me.
11 I am NOT talking about hacks like putting additional *.as files through
12 echo(hello Boost ebuild) or doing something crazy with subshells.
14 But most of the eclass and ebuilds are readable quite simple if you read
15 devmanual, PMS and have a brain.
17 Of course, there are sometimes non-trivial stuff that is hard to read.
19 But majority of ebuilds and eclasses are fine to understand and predict.
21 So, without examples from you, this discussion will lead to nowhere, so,
22 please let's stop it.
24 --
25 Best regards, Sergey Popov
26 Gentoo developer
27 Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead
28 Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature