Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors - improve the concept or discard it? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:02:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1181177896.15396.59.camel@workbox.quova.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors - improve the concept or discard it? by George Prowse |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 01:08 +0100, George Prowse wrote: |
| 2 | > from http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/coc.xml |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Look at the Council logs from the CoC being approved and the ones since. |
| 5 | We asked for real guidelines so we could specifically avoid this sort of |
| 6 | problem from happening. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Chris Gianelloni |
| 10 | Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 11 | Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 12 | Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 13 | Gentoo Foundation |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors - improve the concept or discard it? | George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> |