1 |
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:19:47 +0000 |
2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Attached is the final draft. No substantial changes since last time, |
5 |
> just wording cleanups and a few clarifications. You'll be able to see |
6 |
> it here in an hour or three (check the dates!): |
7 |
> |
8 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Or you can try to read the attached RST source, but no moaning that it |
11 |
> looks weird if you do. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Unless there are any huge flaws found, I'd like this to be voted on by |
14 |
> the council -- looks like it'll have to wait until April's meeting to |
15 |
> fit in with the two weeks rule. |
16 |
|
17 |
Nothing major, just a few minor issues (I'll admit I'm late): |
18 |
"* Portage must extend portageq to implement a command which |
19 |
returns whether or not the profile used for a given repository ID |
20 |
matches a certain base path (e.g. portageq profile_used |
21 |
default-linux/sparc/sparc64/2004.3 gentoo-x86)." |
22 |
Wording here is a bit unclear, I assume it's supposed to mean wether or |
23 |
not the (any) used profile belongs the the given repoid and is (a |
24 |
subprofile of) the given profile name. Using "path" here is dangerous, |
25 |
e.g. portageq profile_used base gentoo-x86. |
26 |
|
27 |
As any substantial change results in a new news item should there be an |
28 |
optional "Obsoletes" header? Could be used to make sure people only see |
29 |
the most current version (without relying on rsync to wipe deleted |
30 |
files). |
31 |
|
32 |
Marius |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
36 |
|
37 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
38 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |