| 1 |
On T, 2011-05-17 at 03:48 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> And after the bugs are mostly (or all) dealt with, I suggest we remove |
| 3 |
> USE="v4l2" and make USE="v4l" mean: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> "Enable support for video4linux (with or without userspace library libv4l)" |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> And rename the pkgs using USE="v4l2" to USE="v4l". Since there will be |
| 8 |
> only video4linux version 2, using libv4l or without (or possibly using |
| 9 |
> libv4l compability layer for libv4l1). But no more straight up version |
| 10 |
> 1 support since videodev.h is gone since Linux 2.6.38 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I think for a while people would read "v4l" as "v4l1", as v4l did denote |
| 13 |
version 1. Any reason not to congregate everything to USE="v4l2" |
| 14 |
instead? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Mart Raudsepp |
Archives