Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:28:44
Message-Id: 1110745344.18760.9.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:00 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:49:40 +0100 Adrian Lambeck
3 > <adrian.lambeck@×××××××××.de> wrote:
4 > | Please have a look at it and tell me what you think:
5 > | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0035.html
6 >
7 > Any automatic machine-done changes to ebuilds will break the tree far
8 > more than the occasional developer screwup.
9
10 I'm afraid that I would have to agree. While automatic checks that send
11 nasty-grams to the maintainer would be feasible, it shouldn't go around
12 editing ebuilds on its own.
13
14 --
15 Chris Gianelloni
16 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
17 Games - Developer
18 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature