| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:56 -0500, Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> said: |
| 3 |
> > Only thing I see |
| 4 |
> > as lacking is we might want to get a doc together on how to properly upgrade |
| 5 |
> > your toolchain so we don't get an influx of bugs from users that have a |
| 6 |
> > system half compiled with 3.3 and the other half with 3.4 so they get linking |
| 7 |
> > errors. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Seems people read this to mean that I was going to write a doc, which I have |
| 10 |
> no intentions on doing. I believe adding "It is recommended that you `emerge |
| 11 |
> -e system && emerge -e world` after merging gcc-3.4" to the einfo at the end |
| 12 |
> of the gcc-3.4.4 install should be good enough. I'm not sure how other archs |
| 13 |
> handled the migration, but I haven't been able to find any docs online. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> So, let me know if marking it stable in the next day or two is completely |
| 16 |
> stupid and I should wait to announce this via the GWN or something, or if its |
| 17 |
> an alright move and people aren't going to stab me for marking it stable. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
einfo "$stuff" and mark it stable later today wins my vote. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
solar <solar@g.o> |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives