| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 22:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:19:43 +0200 Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | What about !arch or something (to connect with the one reply to the |
| 5 |
> | summary thread) to really indicate unstable on that arch? Should |
| 6 |
> | cover those things that sorda work on the arch, but you rather want |
| 7 |
> | developers or experienced users that can patch bugs to look at it ... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Those go in per-profile package.masks. It's more flexible than a |
| 10 |
> keyword. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I would have said a keyword is more flexible (and less work) than |
| 14 |
package.masks, but I do not put that much value in the idea - was more |
| 15 |
just to have something more to kick around. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Martin Schlemmer |
Archives