1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
i can confirm that i have not encountered any problems with |
4 |
LVM 1.0.3 on gentoo-2.4.18 |
5 |
the patch applied nicely and the kernel compiled fine, aftet that i |
6 |
emerged lvm-user-1.0.3 and i had it going... |
7 |
|
8 |
gentoo rocks! |
9 |
|
10 |
Thilo |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
On Saturday, 2. March 2002 13:25, you wrote: |
14 |
> Hi, |
15 |
> |
16 |
> the patches from lvm 1.0.3 applied nicely to the 2.4.18, compiling |
17 |
> went fine too, now i just need to use it.. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> i sure like to see this in the (gentoo||vanilla) kernel some time |
20 |
> greetings |
21 |
> Thilo |
22 |
> |
23 |
> On Thursday, 28. February 2002 23:07, you wrote: |
24 |
> > Hi, |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > today i tried to setup a LVM on a ataraid device. This failed |
27 |
> > because, LVM-1.0.1-rc4 does not support ataraid devices. i |
28 |
> > atteched a new lvm-user ebuild which updates LVM to 1.0.3 (which |
29 |
> > includes support for ataraid devices)... it's basically a |
30 |
> > copy+paste of the old one. |
31 |
> > it compiled nicely on my homemachine - and i will use it with the |
32 |
> > gentoo bootdisc tommorrow... |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > this is bug #898 |
35 |
> > |