| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 06/10/2005 08:44 AM, Duncan wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> To me, that's a valid link, one that Gentoo should be proud of. In |
| 7 |
> deleting that page, it's as if we are trying to wash away some part of our |
| 8 |
> past, "the bad old days", that we are somehow ashamed of. To me, that |
| 9 |
> just doesn't seem right. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I think the intention was to remove everything that wasn't maintainable |
| 12 |
and didn't have anything to do with politics, but I do agree with you |
| 13 |
here. That 3 article series is really, really well written and IMHO |
| 14 |
should not be removed from the site. That said, amybe we can can contact |
| 15 |
DW and ask for a permalink of sorts? Or if we could mirrior the article |
| 16 |
on our site? Any other solutions? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What this would also probably being up is why the bias towards those 3? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- -- |
| 22 |
Shyam Mani | <fox2mike@g.o> |
| 23 |
docs-team | http://gdp.gentoo.org |
| 24 |
GPG Key | 0xFDD0E345 |
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
iD8DBQFCqQf/YZNYgP3Q40URAswoAJ4wft1csjuLDZeG8d1ESjl1ZDdaqQCgviJp |
| 29 |
pZs27+uBq+GRsL5hnhYoebs= |
| 30 |
=L/ui |
| 31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives