| 1 |
well of course I dont really start a flame war, so I hope its not inevitable ;) |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I asked some questions here 3 months ago, about how DEPENDs in an ebuild |
| 5 |
can be formatted, when some software can use either of 2 libraries, to build and |
| 6 |
run, but not both at the same time, and both libs have their own useflag. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
well I got some answers, tried them out, and it didnt work with strange errors |
| 9 |
(probably portage caused, but dunno), then I used an approach which someone told |
| 10 |
me to be "deprecated", and it worked flawlessly :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I submitted the ebuild to bugs.gentoo.org |
| 13 |
bug #47130 |
| 14 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47130 |
| 15 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=29012&action=view |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
which then laid idle for over 3 months and is still not in the portage tree |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
so my slightly impatient question, why is it being ignored? If it doesnt conform |
| 20 |
with some convention or has bugs, please tell me, i can fix that. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Motiontrack is my own project, so its no problem for me to release or modify |
| 23 |
the ebuild for new motiontrack versions when I release them, this way |
| 24 |
maintaining the ebuild. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
hell that project is even developed under gentoo linux, it'd be a shame if |
| 27 |
theres no ebuild for it. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Corvus Corax |
| 31 |
aka Eric Noack |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
(aka "gentoo" in bugzilla, thats because i thought that name field would be the |
| 34 |
"password" field, without reading the form properly *duck* ;) |
Archives