1 |
> Honestly, I think this is pretty on-topic for gentoo-dev given a lot of us |
2 |
> are quite interested in this. |
3 |
^ this |
4 |
|
5 |
> - I'm not sure why you would need virtual/toolchain or virtual/binutils |
6 |
> unless it's just for usage within bootstrapping scripts? Seems more like |
7 |
> you could just remove gcc from @system and such? |
8 |
^ this too |
9 |
|
10 |
FWIW, a minimal chroot (corresponding to a stage3) rebuilds quite nicely with |
11 |
clang, with one exception (sys-libs/glibc obviously). |
12 |
|
13 |
Being able to build glibc with clang is seen as a desirable long-term goal by |
14 |
glibc upstream, seems to be nontrivial to implement though. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
18 |
dilfridge@g.o |
19 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
20 |
(council, qa, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |