| 1 |
/me waits impatiently for new, GPL-incompatible GNOME and KDE licenses |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-- Jason Rhinelander |
| 4 |
-- Gossamer Threads, Inc. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Christian Gut wrote: |
| 8 |
> another one? |
| 9 |
> /. says incompatible to GPL... :( |
| 10 |
> -----Forwarded Message----- |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>>From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@×××××××××××.org> |
| 13 |
>>To: misc@×××××××.org |
| 14 |
>>Subject: The new apache license |
| 15 |
>>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:38:08 -0700 |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>>And another license issue.. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>>The new apache license is not acceptable. Code written under that |
| 20 |
>>new license will never go into our tree. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>>Look, I am quite frankly getting sick and tired of this. It is time |
| 23 |
>>for the user community to tell these software developers who have |
| 24 |
>>gotten themselves involved with lawyers to stop it. They are NOT |
| 25 |
>>making their software better, they are NOT protecting anyone, and |
| 26 |
>>they we NOT making their software any more free when they add new |
| 27 |
>>terms. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>>As of this moment in time, therefore, it looks like the httpd in |
| 30 |
>>OpenBSD has now become a fork. It will continue to be managed |
| 31 |
>>under the existing license. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives