| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:09:23PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to |
| 3 |
> conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind |
| 4 |
> enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out |
| 5 |
> of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's RESTRICT="mirror". |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
It doesn't need RESTRICT=fetch; there is no assumption that you agree to |
| 8 |
the license just by downloading the software. Installing it, however, |
| 9 |
does apparently require acceptance of the license, so eutils.eclass's |
| 10 |
check_license function should probably be used. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Also, I failed to see such ACCEPT button in their homepage.. but I see |
| 13 |
> one after starting it(!). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> ${PORTDIR/licenses/Nero |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> <snip> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> B.BY INSTALLING THE DOWNLOADED SOFTWARE, YOU ARE AGREEING TO BE BOUND |
| 20 |
> BY THE TER MS OF THIS AGREEMENT BY MEANS OF CLICKING THE “ACCEPT” |
| 21 |
> BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS |
| 22 |
> AGREEMENT, PROMPTLY UNINSTALL AND DELETE THE SOFTWARE AND ALL THE |
| 23 |
> ACCOMPANYING ITEMS (INCLUDING DOCUMENTATION OR MANUALS). |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> </snip> |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives