| 1 |
On 07/04/16 17:36, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday, April 7, 2016 6:22:16 PM CEST, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Again, I don't see this as a reason not to make it optional, but I |
| 4 |
>> suspect that we will find bugs here from time to time which users who |
| 5 |
>> run with the split /usr will have to report/fix. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Considering the advantages of usr-merge are rather specific IMHO but |
| 9 |
> risks during the migration are high, I think you're optimistic on the |
| 10 |
> user base of usr-merged systems :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Heck, it hasn't happened yet because there hasn't been such a big need |
| 13 |
> for it. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
In the spirit of hearing arguments for/against .. could someone with the |
| 16 |
appropriate 'fu' throw up a quick survey for those on this ML (and/or |
| 17 |
possibly the g-users?) to indicate a preference for a change to a |
| 18 |
flattened-/usr system? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I did think re: the eudev "debate" that it was really hard to quantify |
| 21 |
the opinion for and against a change, and take it away from the vocal |
| 22 |
people that obviously feel passionately about their cause :) . |
Archives