| 1 |
On 21-11-2017 20:19:21 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: |
| 2 |
> Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > maybe ewarn() is more appropriate than einfo()? |
| 5 |
> > Just in case it's executed outside the scope of prefix |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I can't remember any use case when portage (or, paludis, etc.) is |
| 8 |
> executed as a normal user but not a from Prefix. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> This message will only affect Prefix users, who won't be surprised that |
| 11 |
> they cannot create new groups or users. Therefore I think einfo is more |
| 12 |
> appropriate. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Furthermore, we do have Prefix that runs as a root, mostly usable on NAS |
| 16 |
> or smartphones, when we do ultimately like portage to manage groups and |
| 17 |
> users. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I think we could definitely live with this until someone requests |
| 20 |
otherwise. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks, |
| 23 |
Fabian |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 27 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives