1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 07.01.2017 kell 20:59, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: |
2 |
> # Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> (06 Jan 2017) |
3 |
> # No releases of this API version since April 2001, abandoned |
4 |
> # in favour of gtk+:2 for 14 years. |
5 |
> # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 604862. |
6 |
> x11-libs/gtk+:1 |
7 |
|
8 |
This was a failed try to get this to show up on -dev-announce, but of |
9 |
course I don't have such fancy Reply-To munging fields by default and |
10 |
with localized stuff I didn't pay attention I was using CC. |
11 |
Previous tries just went to /dev/null, because apparently I need to set |
12 |
a Reply-To field myself per some hidden documentation at comrel |
13 |
wiki[1], while both devmanual pages that talk of sending last rites e- |
14 |
mails[2][3] don't have a mention of it. |
15 |
Additionally gentoo-dev that accepted this already sets the Reply-To as |
16 |
needed, so anyone looking from the side, it's already all fine, only |
17 |
infra and my Sent folder would know I "failed" to put the Reply-To. |
18 |
|
19 |
If gentoo-dev feel the need to set Reply-To in my place, then gentoo- |
20 |
dev-announce should do the same and not throw my mail into /dev/null, |
21 |
but into some regular moderation rules after setting the Reply-To |
22 |
itself then. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
1. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:ComRel/Developer_Handbook/What_you_get |
26 |
2. https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/ |
27 |
2. https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-maintenance/index.html |