From: | nado@××××××××××.be | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Correct/clarify SSL/TLS-related flags | ||
Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:16:29 | ||
Message-Id: | f789112c33ba5328f48dbe71d25b7356@troglodyte.be | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Correct/clarify SSL/TLS-related flags by Ulrich Mueller |
1 | January 31, 2018 10:53 AM, "Ulrich Mueller" <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > The gnutls flag doesn't have the meaning "I want gnutls". It has |
3 | > the meaning "I prefer net-libs/gnutls as SSL/TLS provider". So with |
4 | > USE="-ssl" the gnutls flag is a no-op, and neither the ebuild nor |
5 | > the user should have to care about it. |
6 | > |
7 | > Ulrich |
8 | |
9 | I agree, it is bothersome to have to add extra negative use flags when it could be ignored. |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Corentin “Nado” Pazdera |