| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 02:32:45PM -0400, Stewart Honsberger wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> >i have seen many bugs where people who have used -march=k6* in their CFLAGS |
| 4 |
> >experienced segfaults, compile failures, etc... |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >i'd like to propose adding a warning to make.conf to deter ppl from using |
| 7 |
> >these flags ... rather i'd suggest they use -mcpu=k6* ... |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> >the bug can be found at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24379 |
| 10 |
> >i just want to know if anyone out there has had *success* with this flag |
| 11 |
> >... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> My entire server (AMD K62-400) is built around -march=k6; stage1 |
| 14 |
> ground-up, however I am using the 1.2 profile with GCC 2.95. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Does -march=k6-2 exist for 2.95? I'd hate to destabalize my server to |
| 17 |
> test, but I might be able to scrounge up another of the same chip and |
| 18 |
> motherboard. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Not AFAIK. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> Stewart Honsberger |
| 25 |
> Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
> http://www.snerk.org/ |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 34 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives