| 1 |
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 02:51:39PM +0200, Lars Weiler wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> [07/05/26 10:52 +0200]: |
| 3 |
> > Please speak up now if there are major reasons to keep muttng in the |
| 4 |
> > tree, despite being unmaintained and out of date. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I'm okay with removing muttng from the tree. Some weeks ago |
| 7 |
> I tested the old mutt again, but unfortunately not all |
| 8 |
> patches work the same like in muttng. Especially the |
| 9 |
> sidebar-patch which made my life easier. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Just FYI the sidebar-patch is going to be taken out of the Gentoo's |
| 12 |
mutt-patchset. It is going to get a USE flag for itself and it is going |
| 13 |
to be either sidebar or rest of the patches. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
This is because of bug #174080. Upstream claims 'it is a configuration |
| 16 |
problem' and I claim that the sidebar patch is braindamaged and so it is |
| 17 |
going the way of the dodo. Since people seem to use it anyway, you'll be |
| 18 |
able to use it with USE=sidebar in the next mutt's release. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- ferdy |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Fernando J. Pereda GarcimartÃn |
| 24 |
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 |
Archives