1 |
On 10/08/2011 06:13 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 08-10-2011 11:05:08 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
>> If the extra 16 days will actually accomplish something beyond just |
4 |
>> delaying libpng then we can debate the finer points of policy. |
5 |
>> However, if we're just arguing policy for its own sake then I don't |
6 |
>> see the value. Perhaps a package maintainer might have the "right" to |
7 |
>> a few weeks to fix things, but in the end you have to put the distro |
8 |
>> and its users first. You can do that either by speaking up or |
9 |
>> standing aside, but if you're going to speak up, then make sure you |
10 |
>> can follow through. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It seems to me like you say here that any policy that Gentoo has that |
13 |
> you just don't like can be ignored because, well, you just don't like |
14 |
> it. |
15 |
> We can discuss whether or not the policy is ok, but should we ignore the |
16 |
> policy for that reason? I think not. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
It's not like fastened lastriting hasn't happened before. I question |
21 |
your motives in picking this particular one. It's not like I expected |
22 |
cookies for the time I've put into this porting effort, but not this |
23 |
"attack" either. |
24 |
|
25 |
whatever |
26 |
|
27 |
- Samuli |