1 |
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 21:14:49 Matt Turner wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib |
4 |
> > when necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no |
5 |
> > need to explicitly list zlib as part of the system target. so time to |
6 |
> > drop it. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I don't object to this, but just to satisfy my curiosity, what are the |
9 |
> effects of removing, say, zlib or readline from the system profile? |
10 |
> It'd be very difficult if not impossible to construct a system without |
11 |
> these. The only effect I've noticed from changes like these are that |
12 |
> sometimes the packages will be depcleaned from stage3 tarballs if |
13 |
> nothing has them in RDEPEND. |
14 |
|
15 |
you should be able to USE='-readline -zlib' and, for the most part, not have |
16 |
them get used. certainly for readline, almost nothing in the core (or much of |
17 |
the tree) uses it -- if we ignore bash because it bundles a copy of readline. |
18 |
|
19 |
i also want to keep it simple for slimmed down systems, and to keep the "core" |
20 |
set as small as possible for older systems during upgrade paths. |
21 |
-mike |