1 |
Dnia 2013-12-19, o godz. 22:47:50 |
2 |
heroxbd@g.o napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> writes: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > And that brings another issue in Gentoo -- gcc-config. AFAIR this tool |
7 |
> > is completely insane and switches libstdc++ along with gcc version. |
8 |
> > As a result, after switching to a gcc version with different C++ ABI, |
9 |
> > installed software gets broken. And you can't really fix it without |
10 |
> > going through the broken-system state or some hackery. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Not that insane. Packages linked with libstdc++ are not crucial in |
13 |
> Gentoo, and can be rebuilt with emerge -e @world. Although it's a bad |
14 |
> idea for everybody to do so, the systems without "emerge -e @world" for |
15 |
> two years is likely to suck anyway. |
16 |
|
17 |
I think you are getting it the other way around. |
18 |
|
19 |
It's not 'we do not need to support C++ properly because there are no |
20 |
C++ packages crucial to Gentoo'. It's rather 'we have no crucial C++ |
21 |
packages because C++ support in Gentoo is broken by design'. It is |
22 |
a limitation, not a reason to keep stuff buggy. |
23 |
|
24 |
Think of paludis as a good example. People who'd like to use Paludis |
25 |
will end up with broken package manager from time to time. How are they |
26 |
supposed to rebuild it without a working package manager? |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
Michał Górny |