From: | Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package |
Date: | Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:37:08 |
Message-Id: | 1071005819.31024.34.camel@sephora |
1 | Hi All, |
2 | |
3 | I'll refer you first to: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32096 |
4 | |
5 | Then I'll ask two questions: |
6 | |
7 | 1. Should man-pages really belong in the base system (emerge system)? |
8 | |
9 | 2. Which package's manpages should be preferred, assuming (as is correct |
10 | to assume at least until portage-ng comes out) that portage has no |
11 | conflicting-files-resolution feature? |
12 | |
13 | Thanks, |
14 | -- |
15 | Seemant Kulleen |
16 | Developer and Project Co-ordinator, |
17 | Gentoo Linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant |
18 | |
19 | Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E |
20 | Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package | Lisa Seelye <lisa@g.o> |