Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-commits list lives!
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:00:11
Message-Id: fc1o80$9n6$1@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-commits list lives! by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 >> It's a shame xmlGawk got punted, it was the best project of its ilk
3 >> imnsho. That other project[1] was deader than a dodo, vapier ;P
4 >
5 > that "other project" was started by the xmlGawk author as the replacement
6 > of xmlGawk ... i know because we talked about it via e-mail :P
7 >
8 Heh, OK, my bad. :oops:
9
10 > i'm not going to make a core package dependent on an external patchset
11 > again let alone one that requires linking against cruft in /usr ... it was
12 > a pima
13 Ah, I see - understood then.
14
15 Thanks for sorting out the plugins flag for bash, btw.
16
17
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list