Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:52:44
Message-Id: 20070315174646.34afed48@snowdrop
1 On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:33:12 -0300 Mauricio Lima Pilla
2 <pilla@g.o> wrote:
3 > On Thursday 15 March 2007 14:15:05 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 > > Which, even if it were true, is besides the point if doing so
5 > > prevents any development from getting done. And just how much
6 > > development gets done on the forums?
7 >
8 > If you are going to attack the forums in each message you send to
9 > this list, why don't you just add it to your signature?
10
11 Why are those responsible for the forums unwilling to accept any
12 feedback or criticism, instead attacking the attacker or accusing the
13 attacker of merely being one of my pawns? Or, when it happens on the
14 forums, making unspecific vaguely worded threats to ban anyone that
15 does it? At least the Portage developers *admit* that their codebase
16 sucks.
17
18 For Gentoo to get back to delivering something, its problems need to be
19 acknowledged and addressed. This is something that is consistently not
20 happening.
21
22 --
23 Ciaran McCreesh
24 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
25 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
26 Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems Mauricio Lima Pilla <pilla@g.o>