| 1 |
On Thursday 03 August 2006 15:42, Daniel Black wrote: |
| 2 |
> I've added new versions of these libs to gentoo. They are currently in |
| 3 |
> package.mask because I've missed a few bumps versions in between and there |
| 4 |
> is an ABI change. Some old deprecated functions have been removed. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So far these have been working for me fine however I'd appreciate your |
| 7 |
> assistance in further testing these before I unmask them. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Well a security bug has come up requiring a stable version of packages that |
| 11 |
are currently masked. I don't envisage mass breakage thanks to those of you |
| 12 |
who have previously tested the gnutls 1.4.1 versions. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I would however appreciate a little more testing before it is marked stable. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
To participate please: |
| 17 |
1. add |
| 18 |
~net-libs/gnutls-1.4.4 |
| 19 |
~dev-libs/libtasn1-0.3.5 |
| 20 |
to /etc/portage/package.unmask and /etc/portage/package.keywords files. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
2. emerge -1 ~net-libs/gnutls-1.4.4 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
3. run revdep-rebuild |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
4. and report bugs on bugs.gentoo.org making them block bug 147682 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I much appreciate your assistance in this manner. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Daniel Black <dragonheart@g.o> |
| 32 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives